Concerns Register

A framework that publishes its difficulties is more credible than one that does not. This document is not a disclaimer. It is a commitment — to the practitioners, families, and researchers who engage with this work seriously enough to deserve the honest version.

This document is updated as concerns are resolved or escalate. Version 3 · April 2026.

---

1. Why this document exists

Every educational framework has problems. Most frameworks do not publish theirs. ÆRA does, for three reasons.

First, honesty is part of the methodology. A school that teaches children to assess their own work honestly cannot present itself to the world differently. The same standard applies.

Second, the concerns documented here are being actively worked on. Publishing them creates accountability — both for the ÆRA team and for the network of practitioners, researchers, and legal experts who engage with this work. The research section is open to annotation. Several concerns in earlier versions of this document were improved by contributors who had expertise the founding team did not.

Third, a school founder or family reading this document deserves to know what they are actually taking on. The ÆRA methodology is serious work. The barriers documented here are real. Where a concern has implications for families considering enrolment, this document says so directly.

The concerns are organised by category. Each includes: what the concern is, why it matters, what is being done about it, and where things currently stand. The appendix contains a jurisdictional map for schools considering implementation across EU member states.

---

2. The coach

The methodology's most important variable is also its scarcest dependency. The coach concern has three distinct dimensions.

Finding them

The people the methodology needs are not, for the most part, in the conventional teaching pipeline. They are polymathic generalists — intellectually curious across many domains, personally still learning, capable of governing a democratic circle without steering it, comfortable saying "I don't know, let's find out." The conventional system selects against this profile. Teaching as a profession has been designed around subject specialism, curriculum delivery, and compliance with assessment frameworks. The people who thrive in that system are not usually the people this methodology requires.

The assistant coach pathway — a structured apprenticeship that develops the right disposition into full coaching range over four years — is the structural answer to this. It means the methodology is not wholly dependent on finding fully formed polymath educators. It develops them.

Current status: the assistant coach pathway is operational at ÆRA Sintra from September 2027. The certification framework — making the pathway portable across Licensed schools — is in development. Target: Q3 2028.

Paying them adequately

The economics only work at the right ratio and fee structure. One lead coach and one assistant coach per fifteen to twenty children, at a fee structure that is accessible but sustainable, produces the conditions under which meaningful remuneration is possible. If either variable is compromised — larger groups, lower fees, or a third-party operating model that extracts margin — the economic case for adequate pay breaks down, and the methodology loses the people it needs.

This is a discipline problem as much as an economic one. Schools implementing the methodology must hold the ratio. The temptation to grow faster by increasing group sizes is real and must be resisted structurally, not just by intention.

Current status: the economic model is documented in the Sintra Truth Document v4. The ratio is a hard condition of the Licensed tier. Any Licensed school found to be operating above the ratio is in breach of the methodology licence.

Retaining them

Coaching at the depth the methodology requires is demanding. The Rhythm Notes system, the Aptitude Map maintenance, the democratic facilitation, the emotional labour of holding fifteen children in genuine relationship across four years — this is not work that can be done well by someone who is depleted. Burnout is a real risk.

The methodology's answer is structural: genuine autonomy, no prescriptive curriculum, peer review rather than performance management, and a community of practitioners alongside working artists and farmers. These are conditions rather than perks. They are the environment that makes sustained good coaching possible. Schools that strip these conditions to reduce cost will lose their coaches.

Current status: the working conditions specification is in the Role Specifications document v1. It is a condition of the Licensed tier. Compliance is assessed at the annual methodology audit.

---

3. The families

The most common failure mode in alternative education is not the methodology — it is the family.

This is uncomfortable to say. It is true.

Children arriving from conventional schools

Children who arrive from conventional schooling after several years have been trained to optimise for grades, wait for instruction, and perform rather than explore. The Deschooling Period — three to four months of deliberate, supported unstructuring — is the methodology's answer. It is grounded in self-determination theory: intrinsic motivation that has been suppressed by external reward systems takes time to re-emerge.

Families need preparation for this period that is honest rather than reassuring. A child who appears to be doing nothing for three months is not failing — they are recovering a motivational architecture that was functional before external control suppressed it. But a family watching this without preparation will conclude the school is not working. The compatibility conversation at enrolment is not optional.

Current status: the Deschooling Period protocol is specified in Framework 11–18 v1. The family preparation materials — a structured conversation guide and a written briefing for families — are in development. Target: Q2 2027.

Families who chose correctly but cannot tolerate the anxiety

The second population is more difficult. These are families who understood the methodology, agreed with it, and enrolled for the right reasons — and who cannot, when it becomes real, tolerate the anxiety of not seeing grades. A child who cannot point to a test score or a class ranking produces a specific kind of parental anxiety that the school cannot resolve through reassurance alone. It requires a different kind of evidence: the Aptitude Map's adventure view, the Mastery Record's portfolio, the Guild Council records, the Phenology Journal. The evidence exists. The family needs to be taught to read it before they need it.

Current status: the family engagement framework — including regular structured conversations in lieu of report cards — is specified but not yet fully documented as a family-facing toolkit. This is a gap.

---

4. The evidence gap

Phase I of the methodology rests on strong, multi-tradition evidence. Five decades of research across Montessori, Waldorf, Sudbury, place-based education, and adaptive mentoring, plus the developmental science base documented in the Literature Review. The evidence for Phase I is robust.

Phase II is different. The specific combination of placement-integrated learning, cooperative governance, and the Founding Project model is genuinely new. The individual components are evidenced — the Swiss Berufslehre placement model, Gray and Chanoff's Sudbury alumni research, the Big Picture Learning outcomes data. But the combination, as implemented in Phase II of this methodology, has not been longitudinally tested. The research will validate it. It is not yet validated.

This matters for families considering Phase II enrolment and for researchers and policymakers evaluating the methodology. The honest position: Phase II is a well-designed programme grounded in converging evidence from multiple independent traditions. It is not a validated programme with longitudinal outcome data. That data is being generated now, at ÆRA Sintra, and will take years to be available.

Current status: the Phase II research protocol — the specific measurements, instruments, and timelines — is being developed in partnership with affiliated child psychology researchers. Target: research protocol published Q1 2028, first longitudinal data available Q3 2032.

---

5. The legal and regulatory landscape

This is the most significant structural challenge the methodology faces at network scale. It is not an infrastructure problem. It is a legal classification problem — and it operates at three distinct layers.

Layer 1 — The classification problem

What is a school? Every EU jurisdiction answers this question differently. In some countries, a school is defined by its building — permanent structure, inspected, certified to building standards. In others, by its curriculum — nationally approved, delivered by qualified teachers. In others, by its legal entity — registered nonprofit, cooperative, or state-recognised foundation.

The Kit school — a cooperative entity, alternative curriculum, trained but not conventionally qualified coaches, temporary or modular structure — fails at least one of these tests in most jurisdictions. The question is which test is fatal and which is navigable.

In Portugal, the cooperative route is being tested at Sintra. In the Netherlands, the alternative school tradition is strong and the cooperative model is legally recognised. In Germany, the Schulpflicht means the Kit school fails the most important test of all.

Layer 2 — The compulsory attendance vs. compulsory education distinction

This is the single most important variable in any jurisdiction assessment. Most EU countries have compulsory education laws. What varies fundamentally is whether that obligation is satisfied by school attendance or by education itself.

In countries where compulsory education means attending a registered school, home education and unregistered alternative schools are legally precarious or outright illegal. Families who educate children outside registered schools can face prosecution, forced reintegration into the state system, and — in extreme cases — child protection proceedings.

In countries where compulsory education means being educated (regardless of setting), there is significantly more room for alternative models. The obligation is on the outcome, not the institution.

The Kit school's legal viability in any jurisdiction depends almost entirely on which side of this line the jurisdiction sits — and on whether a cooperative school operating an unregistered alternative curriculum falls within or outside the compulsory attendance obligation.

Layer 3 — The recognition problem

Even where a school can legally operate, the recognition of children's learning by the state — for university entry, national qualifications, and transition back to conventional schools — is a separate question. A school can be legal but produce credentials that are invisible to national systems.

The EQF mappability work addresses this at the European level. An EQF-mapped Mastery Record is legible across EU member states and increasingly to international universities and employers. But EQF mappability does not resolve national recognition jurisdiction by jurisdiction — particularly for children seeking to enter university through national routes that require specific national qualifications.

The IBCP pathway, and the Cambridge International modules, address this for university entry. The EQF mapping addresses this for vocational and further education entry. Together, they provide adequate coverage. But the EQF mappability specification is not yet complete, and the IBCP authorisation for ÆRA Sintra is pending.

The honest jurisdictional assessment

The network's growth strategy must be jurisdictionally sequenced. The methodology does not currently work as a primary education setting in every EU country. It works in some. It is difficult in others. It is effectively blocked in Germany.

Portugal — the cooperative school route is viable and being proved at Sintra. The dual planning and licensing process is complex and being navigated with legal counsel. September 2027 opening is the target. The risk is real but being managed.

Netherlands — the most viable early market. Strong alternative school tradition, broad school definition, cooperative model legally recognised, EQF-aligned national qualifications framework. The Kit is deployable here with the lowest regulatory burden of any EU market.

UK — independent school registration is required and inspected by Ofsted, but the process is manageable. Home education is also legally available as an alternative. The IBCP and Cambridge pathways provide qualification coverage. Brexit has removed ErasmusPro funding access, which affects the placement model financially.

Ireland — recognised school status required through the patrons system, but cooperative schools exist and the route is navigable with a local legal partner. Small market but high compatibility.

Spain — significant regional variation. Catalonia has a more permissive framework. Castile-La Mancha and other regions are more restrictive. Requires region-by-region assessment rather than a national strategy.

France — the 2021 Blanquer reform dramatically restricted alternative education. Schools must now demonstrate alignment with the national curriculum framework (socle commun). Home schooling requires annual assessment by state inspectors. The Kit route is difficult without significant additional regulatory compliance work. Not a priority early market.

Germany — the Schulpflicht (compulsory school attendance) is enforced at Länder level and has been used to prosecute families who attempted home education or unregistered alternative schooling. An unregistered Kit school in Germany is not merely legally complex — it could expose families to criminal liability. The methodology is effectively blocked as a primary education setting in most German Länder until the regulatory framework changes. This is stated clearly to protect families from a serious risk.

Belgium — constitutionally guaranteed free choice of school, broad school definition, and a tradition of alternative education. The cooperative model is viable. A priority early market alongside the Netherlands.

Scandinavia — permissive home and forest school frameworks, education-based (not attendance-based) compulsory obligation. The regulatory environment is favourable. The cold-climate solar limitation in the Kit requires a larger energy specification for winter operation north of 50°N — a manageable technical adjustment, not a structural barrier.

The three-tier solution

The licensing problem is specific to schools trying to operate as the primary education setting for children of compulsory school age. Most of the methodology's early adopters will face none of these barriers.

An affiliated school adopting the Campaign framework and Guild Council within an existing licensed school operates within existing regulatory structures. The classification problem, the attendance problem, and the recognition problem are all resolved by the existing school's licence. The methodology is adopted. The legal risk is zero.

This is deliberately part of the network growth strategy. The methodology's reach into complex licensing jurisdictions begins not with Kit schools but with affiliated adoption within existing licensed schools — building evidence, building the research base, and building the case for regulatory change from within systems that already recognise the adopting institution.

Current status: jurisdiction-specific legal opinions commissioned for Portugal, Netherlands, and UK. Spain, Belgium, and Ireland assessments in progress. Germany formally excluded from Kit primary school strategy pending regulatory change. Full jurisdictional playbook target: Q4 2027.

---

6. Infrastructure — what is actually hard

The Kit is designed to eliminate the infrastructure barrier. Everything ships in one 40ft container. No concrete. No heavy machinery. Buildable in six to eight weeks with a local crew. The timber classroom is designed from the outset to meet EU classroom standards: minimum 2m² per child, natural light ratio, ventilation, fire exit. The infrastructure concern is, for most adopters, already resolved.

What remains genuinely hard:

The Sintra structures. The geodesic dome, container kitchen, and ground screws on granite bedrock present challenges specific to building an unusual structure in a National Park in Portugal. ICNF planning permission is the critical dependency for September 2027. Legal counsel and engineering assessment are both in progress. This is being managed — it is not resolved.

Fire safety certification. Geodesic domes have no standard fire safety certification process in any EU jurisdiction. A bespoke fire risk assessment is required before the dome can be legally occupied. This applies to any Kit school using the dome structure. It is not expensive or technically difficult but must happen before occupancy — not after.

Cold-climate energy. The standard Kit energy specification — 8 to 10 solar panels and a 10kWh battery bank — is sized for latitudes similar to Sintra (38°N, 2,700+ sun hours per year). North of 50°N, winter solar irradiance can be 80% lower than summer peak. Schools in northern Europe require a larger energy specification that does not fit in the standard container. This must be specified at procurement — it cannot be retrofitted easily.

Current status: ICNF planning application in preparation. Fire safety engineering brief being issued. Cold-climate Kit specification under development. Target: cold-climate specification published Q2 2027.

---

7. The data architecture

The Sovereign AI Stack — the Chapter Node server, Privacy Firewall tokenisation layer, and end-to-end encryption for all child profile data — is genuinely complex to implement. Small schools cannot build it independently.

This is why the Licensed tier exists: to provide the infrastructure rather than requiring every school to build it independently. But the Licensed tier infrastructure is not yet operational. For early adopters, the honest position is: the full Sovereign AI Stack is coming, not yet available. The Kit provides the methodology. The full data sovereignty architecture follows.

The Developmental Signal standardised schema — the documented instrument that makes Rhythm Notes and Living Signal data comparable across schools — also does not yet exist. Without it, the research layer generates incomparable data. This undermines the longitudinal research function. It is the methodology's most significant internal infrastructure gap.

Current status: Chapter Node specification complete. Privacy Firewall in development. Standardised Developmental Signal schema: commissioned from affiliated researchers, target Q2 2027. Licensed tier infrastructure: operational target Q1 2028.

---

8. The qualification gap

The EQF mappability specification — the document that maps each Realm's skill node clusters to EQF level descriptors — does not yet exist as a complete instrument. The IBCP authorisation for ÆRA Sintra requires a 12 to 18 month lead time and has not yet been submitted. Cambridge International modules are the most immediately accessible qualification pathway for schools operating now.

For families asking about university entry: Cambridge International A-levels or AS-levels, taken in two to three subjects alongside the ÆRA programme, provide university entry routes across Europe and internationally. This is available now. IBCP authorisation, once secured, will provide a more naturally aligned pathway. The EQF mapping, once complete, will provide portability across vocational and further education routes across the EU.

Current status: Cambridge International pathway available immediately. IBCP authorisation submission target Q1 2027; authorisation expected Q3 2028. EQF mappability specification: commissioned, target Q3 2027.

---

9. Current status at a glance

Concern	Status	Target
Coach certification pathway (portable)	In development	Q3 2028
Family preparation toolkit	Gap — not yet documented	Q2 2027
Phase II longitudinal research protocol	Being developed	Q1 2028
Phase II outcome data	Generating from Sept 2027	Q3 2032
Portugal legal counsel (planning + licensing)	In progress	Q2 2026
Netherlands legal opinion	Complete	—
UK legal opinion	Complete	—
Spain, Belgium, Ireland legal assessments	In progress	Q3 2026
Jurisdictional playbook	In progress	Q4 2027
ICNF planning application	In preparation	Q3 2026
Fire safety engineering brief	Being issued	Q4 2026
Cold-climate Kit specification	In development	Q2 2027
Sovereign AI Stack (Chapter Node)	Specification complete	—
Privacy Firewall	In development	—
Licensed tier infrastructure	—	Q1 2028
Developmental Signal schema	Commissioned	Q2 2027
EQF mappability specification	Commissioned	Q3 2027
IBCP authorisation submission	—	Q1 2027
IBCP authorisation expected	—	Q3 2028

---

10. How to contribute

This document is open to annotation at aera.education. If you have expertise in any of the following areas, your contribution is genuinely valuable: education law in any EU jurisdiction, child psychology and assessment, cooperative governance and legal structures, ecological monitoring and citizen science data, building regulations and temporary structure classification.

Annotations that identify errors, gaps, or outdated information are particularly welcome. This document is updated when they are verified.

---

ÆRA Concerns Register · Version 3 · April 2026 · Open document · Freely available · Annotations welcome

---

Appendix — Jurisdictional Map

The following map shows the regulatory landscape for Kit school implementation across EU member states and selected non-EU countries. Colours indicate the viability of the Kit as a primary education setting for children of compulsory school age.

Green: viable now or with manageable compliance. Amber: possible with significant additional work. Red: effectively blocked under current regulatory framework.

This map reflects the position as of April 2026. Regulatory frameworks change. The map will be updated as jurisdiction-specific legal opinions are completed and as the regulatory environment evolves.

<svg viewBox="0 0 900 700" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" font-family="Georgia, serif">

  <!-- Background -->
  <rect width="900" height="700" fill="#F2EDE3"/>

  <!-- Title -->
  <text x="450" y="38" text-anchor="middle" font-size="16" font-weight="bold" fill="#1E4A38">ÆRA — Kit School Regulatory Viability · April 2026</text>
  <text x="450" y="58" text-anchor="middle" font-size="11" fill="#4A4A46" font-style="italic">Primary education setting for children of compulsory school age</text>

  <!-- Legend -->
  <rect x="30" y="80" width="14" height="14" fill="#2D6A4F" rx="2"/>
  <text x="50" y="92" font-size="11" fill="#1C1C19">Viable now or with manageable compliance</text>
  <rect x="30" y="102" width="14" height="14" fill="#D4A24C" rx="2"/>
  <text x="50" y="114" font-size="11" fill="#1C1C19">Possible with significant additional work</text>
  <rect x="30" y="124" width="14" height="14" fill="#8B1A1A" rx="2"/>
  <text x="50" y="136" font-size="11" fill="#1C1C19">Effectively blocked under current framework</text>
  <rect x="30" y="146" width="14" height="14" fill="#C8BFB0" rx="2"/>
  <text x="50" y="158" font-size="11" fill="#1C1C19">Not yet assessed</text>

  <!-- Map area border -->
  <rect x="30" y="175" width="840" height="490" fill="none" stroke="#C8BFB0" stroke-width="0.5" rx="2"/>

  <!-- Sea / background -->
  <rect x="30" y="175" width="840" height="490" fill="#E8F0F0" rx="2"/>

  <!-- PORTUGAL -->
  <path d="M 115 430 L 125 420 L 130 410 L 128 395 L 120 385 L 110 390 L 105 405 L 108 420 Z"
        fill="#D4A24C" stroke="#F2EDE3" stroke-width="1.5"/>
  <text x="117" y="412" text-anchor="middle" font-size="9" fill="#1C1C19" font-weight="bold">PT</text>

  <!-- SPAIN -->
  <path d="M 130 410 L 155 395 L 200 390 L 220 400 L 215 420 L 195 435 L 170 440 L 145 435 L 128 425 Z"
        fill="#D4A24C" stroke="#F2EDE3" stroke-width="1.5"/>
  <text x="175" y="420" text-anchor="middle" font-size="9" fill="#1C1C19" font-weight="bold">ES</text>

  <!-- FRANCE -->
  <path d="M 155 395 L 185 375 L 220 365 L 255 370 L 265 385 L 250 405 L 220 415 L 195 420 L 170 415 Z"
        fill="#D4A24C" stroke="#F2EDE3" stroke-width="1.5"/>
  <text x="215" y="393" text-anchor="middle" font-size="9" fill="#1C1C19" font-weight="bold">FR</text>

  <!-- BELGIUM -->
  <path d="M 220 355 L 245 350 L 260 358 L 255 370 L 235 375 L 218 368 Z"
        fill="#2D6A4F" stroke="#F2EDE3" stroke-width="1.5"/>
  <text x="238" y="364" text-anchor="middle" font-size="9" fill="#F2EDE3" font-weight="bold">BE</text>

  <!-- NETHERLANDS -->
  <path d="M 230 340 L 252 335 L 262 345 L 258 358 L 243 360 L 228 352 Z"
        fill="#2D6A4F" stroke="#F2EDE3" stroke-width="1.5"/>
  <text x="244" y="349" text-anchor="middle" font-size="9" fill="#F2EDE3" font-weight="bold">NL</text>

  <!-- GERMANY -->
  <path d="M 258 310 L 300 300 L 340 305 L 355 325 L 345 355 L 320 370 L 290 368 L 265 358 L 255 340 L 255 320 Z"
        fill="#8B1A1A" stroke="#F2EDE3" stroke-width="1.5"/>
  <text x="305" y="338" text-anchor="middle" font-size="9" fill="#F2EDE3" font-weight="bold">DE</text>

  <!-- SWITZERLAND -->
  <path d="M 258 370 L 278 365 L 295 368 L 298 382 L 278 385 L 260 380 Z"
        fill="#C8BFB0" stroke="#F2EDE3" stroke-width="1.5"/>
  <text x="278" y="379" text-anchor="middle" font-size="8" fill="#4A4A46" font-weight="bold">CH</text>

  <!-- AUSTRIA -->
  <path d="M 298 355 L 340 350 L 365 358 L 362 372 L 330 378 L 298 372 Z"
        fill="#C8BFB0" stroke="#F2EDE3" stroke-width="1.5"/>
  <text x="330" y="367" text-anchor="middle" font-size="8" fill="#4A4A46" font-weight="bold">AT</text>

  <!-- ITALY -->
  <path d="M 255 385 L 280 375 L 310 380 L 330 400 L 320 430 L 300 455 L 280 465 L 265 450 L 260 420 L 252 400 Z"
        fill="#C8BFB0" stroke="#F2EDE3" stroke-width="1.5"/>
  <text x="288" y="418" text-anchor="middle" font-size="9" fill="#4A4A46" font-weight="bold">IT</text>

  <!-- IRELAND -->
  <path d="M 110 310 L 130 305 L 140 318 L 135 335 L 118 338 L 108 325 Z"
        fill="#2D6A4F" stroke="#F2EDE3" stroke-width="1.5"/>
  <text x="124" y="323" text-anchor="middle" font-size="9" fill="#F2EDE3" font-weight="bold">IE</text>

  <!-- UK -->
  <path d="M 148 285 L 175 278 L 188 292 L 185 318 L 168 328 L 150 322 L 140 308 L 143 295 Z"
        fill="#2D6A4F" stroke="#F2EDE3" stroke-width="1.5"/>
  <text x="165" y="306" text-anchor="middle" font-size="9" fill="#F2EDE3" font-weight="bold">UK</text>

  <!-- DENMARK -->
  <path d="M 275 268 L 295 262 L 308 272 L 302 285 L 282 288 L 270 278 Z"
        fill="#2D6A4F" stroke="#F2EDE3" stroke-width="1.5"/>
  <text x="289" y="278" text-anchor="middle" font-size="8" fill="#F2EDE3" font-weight="bold">DK</text>

  <!-- SWEDEN -->
  <path d="M 305 210 L 340 200 L 365 220 L 360 260 L 340 278 L 310 275 L 298 250 L 300 225 Z"
        fill="#2D6A4F" stroke="#F2EDE3" stroke-width="1.5"/>
  <text x="332" y="245" text-anchor="middle" font-size="9" fill="#F2EDE3" font-weight="bold">SE</text>

  <!-- NORWAY -->
  <path d="M 255 195 L 300 185 L 310 205 L 305 230 L 275 240 L 250 228 L 245 210 Z"
        fill="#2D6A4F" stroke="#F2EDE3" stroke-width="1.5"/>
  <text x="278" y="215" text-anchor="middle" font-size="9" fill="#F2EDE3" font-weight="bold">NO</text>

  <!-- FINLAND -->
  <path d="M 345 185 L 390 178 L 415 205 L 408 245 L 378 258 L 350 252 L 338 228 L 340 202 Z"
        fill="#2D6A4F" stroke="#F2EDE3" stroke-width="1.5"/>
  <text x="378" y="222" text-anchor="middle" font-size="9" fill="#F2EDE3" font-weight="bold">FI</text>

  <!-- POLAND -->
  <path d="M 345 295 L 400 288 L 425 300 L 420 335 L 390 345 L 355 340 L 340 320 Z"
        fill="#C8BFB0" stroke="#F2EDE3" stroke-width="1.5"/>
  <text x="383" y="318" text-anchor="middle" font-size="9" fill="#4A4A46" font-weight="bold">PL</text>

  <!-- CZECH REPUBLIC -->
  <path d="M 340 348 L 365 342 L 390 348 L 392 362 L 365 368 L 340 360 Z"
        fill="#C8BFB0" stroke="#F2EDE3" stroke-width="1.5"/>
  <text x="366" y="358" text-anchor="middle" font-size="8" fill="#4A4A46" font-weight="bold">CZ</text>

  <!-- HUNGARY -->
  <path d="M 355 368 L 395 362 L 415 372 L 410 390 L 380 395 L 352 385 Z"
        fill="#C8BFB0" stroke="#F2EDE3" stroke-width="1.5"/>
  <text x="383" y="381" text-anchor="middle" font-size="8" fill="#4A4A46" font-weight="bold">HU</text>

  <!-- ROMANIA -->
  <path d="M 415 335 L 460 328 L 478 348 L 470 378 L 440 385 L 412 375 L 408 352 Z"
        fill="#C8BFB0" stroke="#F2EDE3" stroke-width="1.5"/>
  <text x="443" y="358" text-anchor="middle" font-size="9" fill="#4A4A46" font-weight="bold">RO</text>

  <!-- GREECE -->
  <path d="M 370 430 L 400 422 L 420 435 L 415 455 L 395 462 L 370 452 Z"
        fill="#C8BFB0" stroke="#F2EDE3" stroke-width="1.5"/>
  <text x="394" y="444" text-anchor="middle" font-size="9" fill="#4A4A46" font-weight="bold">GR</text>

  <!-- Baltic states — simplified -->
  <rect x="385" y="255" width="30" height="18" fill="#C8BFB0" stroke="#F2EDE3" stroke-width="1" rx="1"/>
  <text x="400" y="268" text-anchor="middle" font-size="7" fill="#4A4A46" font-weight="bold">EE/LV/LT</text>

  <!-- LUXEMBOURG small -->
  <rect x="248" y="365" width="14" height="10" fill="#2D6A4F" stroke="#F2EDE3" stroke-width="1" rx="1"/>
  <text x="255" y="373" text-anchor="middle" font-size="6" fill="#F2EDE3" font-weight="bold">LU</text>

  <!-- Annotation callouts -->

  <!-- Germany callout -->
  <line x1="305" y1="338" x2="480" y2="295" stroke="#8B1A1A" stroke-width="0.8" stroke-dasharray="3,2"/>
  <rect x="480" y="275" width="200" height="48" fill="white" stroke="#8B1A1A" stroke-width="0.8" rx="2" opacity="0.95"/>
  <text x="490" y="290" font-size="9" font-weight="bold" fill="#8B1A1A">Germany — Schulpflicht</text>
  <text x="490" y="303" font-size="8.5" fill="#1C1C19">Compulsory attendance at state-approved</text>
  <text x="490" y="315" font-size="8.5" fill="#1C1C19">school. Kit route effectively blocked.</text>

  <!-- Netherlands callout -->
  <line x1="244" y1="349" x2="480" y2="350" stroke="#2D6A4F" stroke-width="0.8" stroke-dasharray="3,2"/>
  <rect x="480" y="333" width="200" height="34" fill="white" stroke="#2D6A4F" stroke-width="0.8" rx="2" opacity="0.95"/>
  <text x="490" y="348" font-size="9" font-weight="bold" fill="#2D6A4F">Netherlands — Priority market</text>
  <text x="490" y="360" font-size="8.5" fill="#1C1C19">Broad school definition. Lowest barrier.</text>

  <!-- France callout -->
  <line x1="215" y1="393" x2="480" y2="400" stroke="#D4A24C" stroke-width="0.8" stroke-dasharray="3,2"/>
  <rect x="480" y="383" width="200" height="34" fill="white" stroke="#D4A24C" stroke-width="0.8" rx="2" opacity="0.95"/>
  <text x="490" y="398" font-size="9" font-weight="bold" fill="#D4A24C">France — 2021 Blanquer reform</text>
  <text x="490" y="410" font-size="8.5" fill="#1C1C19">Heavy restrictions on alt. education.</text>

  <!-- Portugal callout -->
  <line x1="117" y1="412" x2="480" y2="450" stroke="#D4A24C" stroke-width="0.8" stroke-dasharray="3,2"/>
  <rect x="480" y="433" width="200" height="44" fill="white" stroke="#D4A24C" stroke-width="0.8" rx="2" opacity="0.95"/>
  <text x="490" y="448" font-size="9" font-weight="bold" fill="#D4A24C">Portugal — Being proved at Sintra</text>
  <text x="490" y="460" font-size="8.5" fill="#1C1C19">Cooperative route viable. Complex dual</text>
  <text x="490" y="472" font-size="8.5" fill="#1C1C19">planning + licensing process underway.</text>

  <!-- UK callout -->
  <line x1="165" y1="306" x2="165" y2="230" stroke="#2D6A4F" stroke-width="0.8" stroke-dasharray="3,2"/>
  <rect x="78" y="208" width="172" height="34" fill="white" stroke="#2D6A4F" stroke-width="0.8" rx="2" opacity="0.95"/>
  <text x="88" y="223" font-size="9" font-weight="bold" fill="#2D6A4F">UK — Independent school registration</text>
  <text x="88" y="235" font-size="8.5" fill="#1C1C19">Manageable. Ofsted inspection required.</text>

  <!-- Source note -->
  <text x="450" y="680" text-anchor="middle" font-size="9" fill="#8A8A84" font-style="italic">
    Assessment based on jurisdiction-specific legal opinions, April 2026. Not legal advice.
  </text>
  <text x="450" y="692" text-anchor="middle" font-size="9" fill="#8A8A84" font-style="italic">
    Full opinions available to Licensed and Certified schools on request.
  </text>

</svg>

Note: This map is a schematic representation. Country boundaries are approximate. For detailed jurisdiction-specific legal assessment, see the full legal opinions available to Licensed and Certified schools on request.